Conferenced Out?

Posted: 29th November 2011 by Gavin Dudeney in General

I’m on a plane… I’m on a plane back from a conference… a very good conference, as it happens. But it was also one of those conferences that neatly summarises many of the problems and paradoxes in the conference goers life.

Firstly the plenary speakers – all white, middle-class, middle-aged+ Brits. One of the first plenary speakers on the first day apologised for being one of the first of a stream of white, middle-aged, middle class British men who would take the stage over the next few days. The rest who followed felt duty bound to say the same thing, I think (and they did). One of them – the only woman plenary speaker at leaast didn’t have to do the full apology. And of course we’ve had this debate before – firstly on my blog, and then on a series of blogs. We know why it happens, but very few like it.

We know why it’s mostly men (the profession being mostly women, it’s assumed that some ‘eye candy’ – such as it is in our profession – is a good thing). We know why it’s mostly Brits (they write global ELT course books and methodology titles, books which sell) As someone intimately involved with large conference organisation I understand and acknowledge the relationship between publishers and conference organisers, I understand why people get parachuted in to do the plenary sessions by publishers – I know how it works. But look – there must be good ‘local’ people working in the profession, people who know something about the country and the teaching there… Would it be too much to ask for some kind of balance – more gender balance, more local and superstar balance, and all that. It’s getting embarrassing for all of us.

Or is it? I have to confess to being on the other side of an obsession with travel. For the past three years I have travelled like a crazy person, accepting ridiculous amounts of invitations, and racking up a carbon footprint that would embarrass most people. I have had an amazing time, visited over forty countries, been to some incredible events and conferences, eaten wonderful food, spent social evenings with amazing people and slept in some lovely hotels. It’s been fantastic. At each event I’ve bumped into someone I know who was also doing a plenary or keynote – sometimes more than five or six times a year. It’s a huge industry and many of us enjoy being part of it.

And if you speak to an author and they tell you it’s all for the love of being in a session room sharing their knowledge with the audience, I would suggest you can take that with a pinch of salt…

Of course it is about that, but it’s also about being loved and appreciated, about being pampered: the cars from the airport, the lovely hotels, the social engagements, the love of an audience, the adulation, the photo opportunities, the video interviews and all the rest. It doesn’t sell more books, necessarily (and that’s actually irrelevant if you write methodology books as I do, royalty payments being what they are) but it validates careers, and it makes people feel wanted, loved and appreciated. Is that too high a price to pay for the carbon spend, or the closed doors to national speakers? I think, perhaps, it may be.

But I know for a fact that it does become an obsession – you travel and speak, therefore you are. I know at least one colleague who will not do anything other than plenary speeches – not for him/her the humble workshop or concurrent keynote – s/he is a plenary speaker! People fear disappearing if they tone down the travel, in much the same way they fear disappearing if they drop off the Twitter timeline, disappear from Facebook, etc. I’m not sure anymore if it’s sustainable or good, and that’s why from next year I won’t be saying yes to everything, and I’ll be choosing carefully – though I wonder if it will make a difference. I still want to visit new countries, meet and talk to new teachers, and share my work with them. I just don’t think I need to do it twenty-six times a year!

I can already envisage the content of comments which the paragraphs above might provoke (symbiosis, that’s what teachers want, it’s what makes a conference attractive and successful, it’s a shame publishers have such a strong grip, etc., etc.) – I’ll seal my predictions in an envelope and open it in a week or so :-)

Anyway, back to that conference….

What of the poor teachers at a busy conference? I tried to put myself in their place over the weekend, tried to analyse the messages I was getting. I think first and foremost it seems I (the idealised local teacher me) am simply not doing much good in the way of service to my learners… I’m not using enough images or video, and not enough technology… I haven’t realised that translation is being rehabilitated and I’m missing the boat, I am slavishly following a syllabus and I’m not doing enough tasks or overt fluency activities. By the end of the weekend I’m sweating buckets… is everyone as bad as me, is everyone doing what I do?

And, if they are, how exactly are they ditching half the syllabus, and doing more fun, free, fluent task-based translation activities based around attractive visuals when they’re punished for deviating from the syllabus and have to get it all done each year. It’s one thing hearing from an expert that slavish addiction to the syllabus will mean it will mostly be ‘in one ear and out the other’ or lead to the great fallacy of ‘what I teach is not what they learn’, but quite another to be called into the academic director’s office and given a roasting for not doing the job you were hired to do. When I remarked on this paradox to one of my colleagues he made the point that the audience also contained ‘decision makers’ and that just seeding discussions around these areas might lead slowly towards a change. And I do take that point, but I still think teachers are given a hard time at conferences sometimes. There’s a lot of ‘we should be….’, but not too much ‘here’s how we do it… no, really, look – you can implement these changes by doing the following…’

As one of the delegates remarked to me, it betrayed an obvious shared history in private language school ELT on the part of the plenary speakers, and this may indeed lead to some misconceptions about what goes on in classrooms in state schools around the world. I think there’s a little bit of truth in that (the point was echoed by one of the plenary speakers himself), but I’m aware that some of those keynote speakers have worked globally with teachers in all sorts of scenarios, so I’m not sure how much weight that can be given. It may come down to a lack of local knowledge – and we’re back to the lack of local plenary speakers problem again.

In many respects I ended up feeling that for me as the imagined teacher, a lot of the conference was in one ear and out the other, and that I wasn’t really learning what they were teaching. But they were the distinguished foreign guests, so maybe it was my problem ;-)     Perhaps the biggest problem was that the conference theme talked of ‘difficulties’ and ‘challenges’, so maybe it was inevitable that the tone should be a little, um, challenging…

My own talk didn’t aim to tell anyone that they were missing something, I don’t think. As the first outing for a talk on the history of educational technologies I think it went quite well, though it needs some reorganisation and I think it’s a bit too heavy in the middle, like a Christmas cake. The talk tries to make sense of twenty years (for me) of EdTech, and tries to map defined technology trigger points with dates, but also with approaches that have come – and occasionally gone – in the world of ELT. I need to reorganise it a bit.

The conference was amazingly slick and there were plenty of quality speakers, both invited from abroad and local ones.

Interestingly, and for the first time in a long time, this was a large conference (900+ people registered) that had no talks about dogme. The closest it got was a talk about doing tech lessons when you don’t have much tech, and I got confused by mentions of ‘unpluggged’! As with technology, I think there are many loud people online making a lot of noise about dogme, but the reality on the ground is very different – we devotees, both plugged and unplugged, are the 0.1% (at most).

Teaching unplugged and technology have that in common, though I suspect access to technology is outstripping licenses to do dogme – it’s the syllabus problem again: if you’re not allowed to make these changes, if you’re not allowed to break the rules, then these fancy methods and approaches are simply no good to you at all – in my last blog post I was asked if I’d observed any ‘dogme moments’ whilst I was in Russia observing classes recently. I’d be more likely to find a giraffe in a Russian state school classroom, frankly. They may all have Macbooks in Moscow junior schools, but there’s still a syllabus to follow, and no time to deviate for fun fluency tasks or ‘dogme moments’… Maybe that will change?

I talked a little bit about change with a coursebook writer at the conference this weekend. He was asking who was more likely to affect change in teachers worldwide – was it me with my online training courses and methodology books, was it him with his course books worming their way into schools around the world? Frankly I don’t really know – if it were a pure numbers game then I’d have to give it to him, but after reflecting on how much can realistically be done within large systems, I suspect we’ve both got about as much chance as each other of affecting any real change in systems. All we can hope for is that we have an affect on some people – and I suppose that’s the teacher’s lot as well.

It was a social weekend and I spent quality time with some lovely people and had some great chats and some great food and some live music. A couple of people were shocked to find out I’m not on Twitter anymore. Someone asked me what my Twitter handle was and I had to confess that I no longer had one.

And inevitably, as it does when I go out and about these days, the talk turned to what it was like not to be on Twitter or Facebook, and how I felt…. It’s interesting, in a way, because now when I go to events I actually find out things – during my Twitter days I would go to dinners and sit next to someone and they’d say “Did you know XXX has changed jobs?” and, of course, I did…. “Do you know YYY is going out with ZZZ”. Well yes, of course I did. Everyone does.

But now I don’t. Sweet release, you see… I don’t know who is seeing who, where people are travelling to, where they’re staying, who they’re having coffee with. And it’s odd, but I don’t care. I know where my loved ones and close friends are and I communicate with them as regularly as I can – we talk. I have rediscovered the joy of catching up with people face-to-face, or in longer, quality conversations on Skype, by email, etc. I am gone, yet not forgotten. Searching for me on Twitter yesterday I see there were people at the conference who mentioned me in passing – I thank them for keeping my memory alive :-)

The day to day passes me by now – the last time I looked at Twitter was about six months ago. I sign in to Facebook to accept friend requests, but I never linger. I get a summary of Twitter, Facebook and the rest inside a beautiful app for the iPad called Flipboard. To ensure I really am not missing out on too much, I signed in just as I was finishing this blog post. I share with you here a random sampling from the first four boards from my Facebook account in Flipboard:

Love is like luck. You have to go all the way to find it. Even then, it depends on your luck to get it or be empty handed

Teen tweeter won’t apolgize to Kan. governor

Don’t hide emotions from your students. Emotions show that you care. And if *you* don’t care, why should they?

To love someone is nothing, to be loved by someone is something, but to be loved by someone you love is everything.

Ohio investigators probe shootings possibly tied to Craigslist ad

When you become calm and serene on the inside the world becomes more calm and serene on the outside

Dead ends are for those who do not want to see the truth

Dear Maths, I do not want to solve your problems bevause I have my own

Dear Google, Please stop behaving like a wife,  kindly let me complete my sentence before you give suggestions

There was more, but you get the picture. After all that, I most surely do feel well developed :-)   Heady stuff, I think you’ll agree…

Now then, I really must get back to work


  1. Jim George says:

    Was entering JALT Conference in Tokyo with a mate last weekend, turns to me and says “I’ve found my tribe – white, middle-aged & bald guys”.

    Depressingly true.

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Jim,

    Yes, well, as a white middle-aged bald guy I can both identify and sympathise. My impression when I was at a JALTCALL conference a couple of years ago was that everyone seemed to also go to the same suit shop for work clothes ;-)

    Gavin

    [Reply]

  2. [...] Conferenced Out? « That'SLife Source: slife.dudeney.com [...]

  3. David says:

    Gavin,

    Enjoy these provoking and heart felt thoughts. Lots to ponder. Hope you get to enjoy some “feet on the ground” time over the holidays.

    Could it be that the nature of conferences themselves are part of the problem? I really would like to see more conferences “force” plenary speakers to post materials and video about their talks. Make it more of a flipped conference where teachers are more armed with info. from which to enjoy the talk. The speaker would also be more able to engage the audience locally, having dealt with the meat and potatoes online.

    I’ve been going to a number of conferences here in Can. / U.S. and see how less insular the TESL conf. circuit is here. Mostly female, very multicultural. A lot more influence from education and less applied linguistics and the private language institute born crowd…..

    I also think online conferences will eventually erode this very tribalistic (bowing to Jim’s comment), ritual event. It will just take time.

    David

    [Reply]

  4. David,

    Part of the problem – whether pre- or post-conference is that many ‘plenary’ speakers earn their livings by flying around the world and doing plenaries (this is more likely to be the case for those who work in academia proper, and perhaps methodology writers than it is for course book writers, who earn their livings from meetings with Ministry folk alongside their talk at a conference) and so are reluctant to have their talks recorded and their handouts posted online.

    I can see how it might be nice to flip that, though – and in idea that might work for more conferences. If you take the average plenary speaker who has worked for, say, 20+ years in the profession and has worked in a variety of areas – you could have an ‘audience with’ type plenary which would allow people to explore a wide range of topics (it works well with actors and comedians here in the UK!) I’m not sure many plenary speakers would welcome the stress, though :-)

    I think it very much depends on the conference: the Annual IATEFL Conference is multicultural, more balanced from a gender perspective, etc., as one example. Change is good – but I can’t see the ‘normal’ conference being eroded out of existence anytime soon.

    Gavin

    [Reply]

  5. Adam says:

    I was at that conference and was assigned the role of ‘roving reporter’ for the BC. While I did a certain amount of photographing and Facebook updating, I still felt that it wasn’t in my personality to go up and hassle people I don’t know. Anyway, this will all be explained more in my next blog post, which kind of brings me round to my point…

    You’d kindly left a couple of replies on my blog in the lead up to the conference and I really wanted to come up and say ‘hello.’ Nevertheless, as we’d never properly met and you were always busy speaking to other people, I didn’t feel that, despite having conversed with you virtually, I had any right to come up and take any of your time. This was both a shame, because I’d really like to have a chat with you at a conference some time, and a reaffirmation of the boundaries I like to keep between online contact and assuming that I have a right to your time when/if we meet in person. I guess such issues were a part of the reason you removed yourself from the twittersphere. As far as coming over and saying hello goes, I apologise in advance for doing so next time.

    While there are many positives to be taken from social networking, I did get a weird feeling when meeting up with someone I’d met through twitter who explained where she’d been over the past few days and I replied, ‘yes, I know where you’ve been.’ We live in interesting times.

    I’m retrospectively a little ashamed about not noticing the sex/color of the plenary speakers, probably because the one female actually came and watched my presentation. To be fair, there were a huge number of female *non-natives* who’d been invited to speak.

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Adam,

    Such a shame not to have got a chance to say hello. In fact I’m much more a fan of meeting people f2f at conferences than online these days. It’s nice to meet a smile, have a chat and a laugh for a few minutes. Such is the nature of conferences, though, that most people look ‘busy’ most of the time as they catch up with people. Shall we try again next time?

    Yes, the balance was well re-addressed in the invited speaker group of people, but there’s still that plenary gap in most conferences and we really should be doing something about it.

    Hope you had a good conference? I certainly did :-)

    Gavin

    [Reply]

  6. Dear Gavin,

    Thank you for this honest post and hitting the nail on the head (although we might need to redefine eye candy.)))) although we were told from the stage by one speaker which women eye candy they prefered and there was a collective hold of breath by the myself and the women around me. Did we really need to know that information?!? I too was at this great conference and went home to my husband that evening and when he asked how it had been I said it was well organized, packed etc. but there were too many white middle aged British men as plenary speakers. But as you have also pointed out it is partly determined by the publishers who give the sponsorship money and the conference needs that money to run. I often wonder what the line up would be if that money wasn’t needed would we still do the same thing and invite international speakers. That I don’t know. I wonder how much we value our own in-country speakers. I also agree with the ‘should’ part of the conference. From quite a few speakers we were addressed as new teachers but looking in the audience of the people I regularly see there were a minority of new teachers but not as many as some speakers seemed to think. I would have liked more explanation about the theory behind or the reasoning of why I should in some of the plenary and keynote seminars rather than it ‘is’ this way. One of the audience I was sitting near passed a comment to a friend of ‘Why should I?’. Although we might have packed syllabus’s we still read and we still think, we discuss to a high level in our offices. Perhaps a bit less ‘teachering’ from some of our speakers might have allowed us to learn.))))))))

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Sharon,

    Thanks for commenting. Yes, I use ‘eye candy’ with a raised eyebrow and in the widest possible sense :-) Obviously we work in an industry like any other, one dominated by money – publishing, training, teaching, earning a wage. These things are inescapable, so we have to accept the ‘balance’ of activity. If everyone could run their own conference without the need for any outside sponsorship then I think we would see different events.

    As for audiences, that is linked to the plenary situation – if you’re invited to visit a country to give a plenary, it’s hard to really find out enough about the teaching context there to be able to tailor your talk to that particular context.

    It’s a complicated process – I don’t necessarily have a solution, but I think we should all keep discussing the issue…

    Gavin

    [Reply]

    Sharon Turner Reply:

    Dear Gavin,

    I agree.) Discussion is the key which is why I am so thankful that you have written the post that you did with as much honesty as you did.)) Take care:))

    Sharon.)

    [Reply]

  7. Graham Daies says:

    Gavin, your life sounds like my life in the 1980s and 1990s. I was in at the beginning of the use of ICT in language learning and teaching in the early 1980s and constantly in demand as a speaker at conferences all over the world – occasionally for very generous fees. I remember some months when I spent just 3-5 days at home. I enjoyed the posh hotels, the conference dinners and rubbing shoulders with like-minded people, but by the mid-1990s I was truly “conferenced out”, and I was also losing track of what was going on in the sphere of ICT and language learning as by then I had taken early retirement (aged 51) from full-time teaching. I still go to one face-to-face conference per year at my own expense, but I only accept invitations to speak at other conferences if I am offered a decent fee.

    I don’t miss the life that I used to have. And I lack the energy now as I approach my 70th birthday in 2012. I use Facebook every day, but most of the 200-odd friends I have there are family and people I have known for a long time but don’t get round to seeing very often as they are scattered all over the world. Twitter now bores me. I have not yet committed “Twittercide”, but I find very little there that interests me.

    Time to walk the dog…

    [Reply]

  8. Graham Davies says:

    Whoops! Must be getting senile – can’t even spell my name!

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Graham,

    Thanks for commenting… Fickle people that we are, are Twitter’s days numbered (in terms of the overhype), I wonder?

    Gavin

    [Reply]

  9. Enda Scott says:

    Hi Gavin,
    thanks for this, a lot to think about. As you know I have been involved in organising TESOL-SPAIN conferences for ten years now and, between myself and my wife, we have been speaker co-ordinators on some six of these annual conferences. All the points you make are very familiar. We try to balance expertise with novelty but when you put “names”, publishers and generally people on the circuit into the hat there often appears to be little room for new-comers. The irony of course is that many of the teachers who attend these conferences are not actually familiar with the “names”, and don’t necessarily know or care who they are. Plenary speakers tend to be judged on their entertainment value rather than content: people are very often looking for the practical ideas you don’t find at plenary talks and on this front, a local teacher, practical, familiar with the context, will often score very highly when it comes to feedback from conference goers as opposed to somebody flow in from abroad.
    It is all complicated. There is a machinery that cannot be completely avoided but as conference organisers we certainly need to aim at a mix … eye candy for all tastes :-) )
    Enda

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Enda,

    Yes, I agree it’s a very tricky balancing act… but one conference I remember this year in Latin America had around eight plenary speakers, all of whom were white, middle-class, middle-aged Brits (or Canadians, Americans, etc…). Again, I would have thought they could have found at least one woman for the conference, and even one ‘token non-native local expert’…. You would think so, wouldn’t you?

    I find myself agreeing more and more these days with your view that “a local teacher, practical, familiar with the context, will often score very highly when it comes to feedback from conference goers as opposed to somebody flown in from abroad”. I know it’s good to have some ‘experts from the field’, but it’s also good to have some experts still in the field…

    Gavin

    [Reply]

    Enda Scott Reply:

    Indeed! See you at a conference somewhere soon … IATEFL perhaps
    Enda

    [Reply]

  10. DaveDodgson says:

    As somebody who is white, British and approaching middle-age faster than he would like, should I make a stand by NOT pursuing a career as a pleanry speaker? :p

    Seriously though, this is like a conference twist on native-speakerism in many schools around the world. Often local teachers are overlooked in favour of some ‘flown in’ native speaker, while at conferences …er.. local teachers are overlooked in favour of some ‘flown in’ plenary speaker.

    Dave

    [Reply]

  11. [...] Gavin Dudeney discusses his thoughts on the event here. [...]

  12. Adrian says:

    Gavin,

    In December I was invited to a conference in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. It was slightly different as it wasn’t an ELT conference but one on technology in the classroom. One thing was very refreshing. I was one of only two white male speakers the rest being mostly from the gulf region and a few from countries such as Malaysia, Korea etc. For me there were two ‘stars of the show’ one lady and one gentlemen both from Saudi Arabia – fantastic speakers who would both grace conferences anywhere in the world.

    [Reply]

  13. Lalitha Murthy says:

    Great blogpost, Gavin. I feel like cheering. I am from India,and a passionate Business englsih trainer.
    I opened your blog ( link from the Besig Conference schedule – Nov 2012)
    English has undergone so many variations, and a local person may be aware of regional nuances. Example ” kindly do the needful” – Indians often use this!
    Also, the local population may feel more comfortable with a local person. They are also more familiar with the challenges in that particular country.
    Look forward to your plenary!
    Regards
    lalitha

    [Reply]

    Gavin Dudeney Reply:

    Lalitha,

    Thanks for the comment – I look forward to seeing you at the conference.

    Gavin

    [Reply]